"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power." - Thomas Jefferson 1820

"There is a growing technology of testing that permits us now to do in nanoseconds things that we shouldn't be doing at all." - Dr. Gerald Bracey author of Rotten Apples in Education

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label StudentsFirst. Show all posts
Showing posts with label StudentsFirst. Show all posts

Monday, January 14, 2013

StudentsFirst does NOT represent School Choice


Does this woman want even more control of educational decisions and state coffers? 

"Entrepreneurial investment in education technology has skyrocketed from $100 million in 2007 to $429 million in 2011. It’s peculiar that the huge increase in companies investing in digital classrooms and testing materials to eventually align with the Common Core State Standards’ requirements began the same year Rhee became Chancellor of DC Schools and Obama began his reign as president". 

Potter Williams Report: War on Education 2013 exposes the federal takeover of education and Michelle Rhee's involvement in the "choice" movement which in reality is not choice for parents.   It's not much of a choice to go from one school to another that has the same common core mandates and the same educational blueprint.  

THERE IS NO SCHOOL CHOICE, and if organizations both conservative and liberal tell you there is, they’re lying. Only the left has the playing field while conservatives grind their teeth on the sidelines. Hedge fund managers who control charter schools versus union-backed majorities on school boards? Where’s the choice? If you want to understand how the war is going, read about the battle for Bridgeport, Connecticut. This is the kind of education reform taking place across the country; and it’s not helping teachers, students, parents or principals who have skin in the game.
Recently StudentsFirst sent out a letter stating Missouri received a "D" ranking according to StudentsFirst's measurements.  It had its recommendations on how:
  • teachers should be evaluated
  • parents should be empowered
  • the legislature should fund education
Why is Michelle Rhee's organization dictating how districts should evaluate their employees, what choices parents/school boards should be making for children in their districts and how state government should be directing funding to educational programs?  Does StudentsFirst's attempts to correct Missouri's educational deficiencies (as it ranks them) reduce federal control and spending?  Do these attempts really create choice or just more public/private partnerships under the ruse of competition?  Ask yourself, what does this private organization have to gain from the changes it wants to see in Missouri....and other states?  Is it really "for the kids"?

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Did Michelle Rhee or one of her TFAers Write These Rambling Letters?


Her words are empty and vague.  So are her educational reform ideas. See if you can discern what they are and what she wants...other than your money. 

Michelle Rhee and her organization StudentsFirst just won't leave Missourians alone with her talking points on educational reform sent via email.  She's about as vague on her reform plans as Arne Duncan saying we need "great teachers".  What's the definition of educational reform and what's the definition of a "great teacher"?  Who and what organizations define and implement those plans for public education?  It's increasingly becoming clear it's not the public.

Parents and taxpayers have no say in educational reform (it's been spelled out for us in Race to the Top and Common Core standards written by private corporations and bureaucrats) and the "great" teachers will be decided by accountability measures not set by local districts.

Ms. Rhee's poorly constructed letter (below) begging for support for educational reform ended up in a Missourian's email inbox.  Her idea of educational reform is as clear as mud and the links provided in her letter don't give the reader additional information on how Ms. Rhee wants to transform education.   If Ms. Rhee wants parents to trust her with educational decisions, it might behoove her to explain what she has in mind for American children.  She does make it clear she wants your donations but she doesn't explain how she will spend your $10.00 or her educational reform plans.

We have questions for Ms. Rhee highlighted yellow in the letter:

************************************************************
From: Michelle Rhee admin@studentsfirst.org
Date: August 15, 2012
To:
Subject: Working for reform in Saint Louis

Studentsfirst.org
Hi member, Be careful if you sign up to receive emails...you are now considered a member.

To put the needs of students first in every school in America, we need people committed to reform in every community. What specifically are the needs of students?  What kind of  people do you need "committed to reform" and what type of reform are you promoting?

Education is a local issue with national implications. How is education a local issue when school boards are impotent to make educational policy decisions?  Missouri schools need advocates to get involved with the reform effort and make a difference.   What is the reform effort and what difference does Ms. Rhee want to see? 

In the last year, we have successfully worked with our members to make progress in states across the country, including passing groundbreaking laws in Georgia, Ohio and Maine.  What groundbreaking laws were passed in those states?  Why would laws that work in other states necessarily mean they are appropriate laws for Missouri school children? This is a great start, but we all know our education system is far from fixed. We have so much more work to do to put the interests of students first.  What work do you have to do in local districts since you are a national group?  What are the interests of students?

Will you work with us to bring comprehensive reform to schools near you? What IS comprehensive reform and why should parents sign onto your idea of reform?  Sign up now to take local action:

http://studentsfirst.org/local-action  Read about the REAL reform needed: Common Core standards rescinded, data mining stopped in public schools and local control restored (not Rhee's national power grab) at truthinamericaneducation.com.

Time and again, we have witnessed those with a vested interest in continuing the status quo rise up and squash local reform movements with their money and power. But allowing the status quo to continue means denying millions of children the chance at the American dream they deserve.  What is this status quo Ms. Rhee refers to and would Ms. Rhee please explain why she wants to raise a billion dollars to push her reforms...whatever they may be?

We cannot let the reform movement be trampled once again. To make real reform possible, we need the resources in place to go out and fight for every child in America.  Tell me what "real reform" means to a billion dollar organization and how that billion dollars will help children....OR will it enrich private businesses to deliver educational products deemed necessary by private organizations while using taxpayer money.

Can you donate $10 to StudentsFirst right now?  No.  You have not laid out your plan of educational reform and these one-liner educational reform talking points make no sense.  When you tell me you want to reduce federal spending and/or control in education, I'll donate to that cause.

http://studentsfirst.org/donate-10-now  Instead, read what Michelle Rhee's bipartisan reform REALLY means for students and taxpayers at this site: RheeFirst!

The excitement and interest pouring in from every corner of the nation is incredible. Keep spreading the word and building this movement for reform.  Jeez, who wrote this letter?  The movement for reform is coming from the corporations, NOT the grassroots.  Nobody asked parents and taxpayers for their votes on Race to the Top or Common Core standards. That was a $4.35 Billion check given to Arne Duncan for HIS (and Michelle Rhee's "vision" for reform).  Unvoted on by citizens. 

We're at the beginning of something remarkable.  Yes, indeed we are.  We are witnessing something remarkable....the destruction of local and state autonomy in any decisions for students and the schools the taxpayers fund.

-- Michelle

Michelle Rhee
CEO and Founder
StudentsFirst

Unsubscribe | Become a Member | Follow Us on Twitter | Find Us on Facebook
825 K St, 2nd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
916-287-9220




The following letter from StudentsFirst  was received by a Florida reader and forwarded on to MEW.  The reader writes:  Don't be fooled by this trickery.  I would add to that statement.." and a narrative that can't be explained except that "it's students first" ":

 *************************************************************************************************************

(For background information, please read this recent Tampa Bay Times opinion editorial by speaker-designate Will Weatherford of the Florida House of Representatives where he discusses the importance of accountability and testing.)

Florida has led the nation in its efforts to establish strong systems of accountability. These systems hold adults accountable for serving all of our students well, and ensure our kids are learning and receiving the education they deserve. Unfortunately, Florida's precedent-setting accountability system is under attack.  From whom?  What group?  Explain.

Local politicians in twelve Florida school districts caved under pressure from special interests (as if Michelle Rhee is not pushing a special interest agenda?) who are working to derail our (who is "our"?  Bill Gates? Arne Duncan?) state’s education reform efforts and adopted a resolution against testing. Could this possibly be the testing to be done every three weeks due to Common Core mandates?  Could that be a reason these districts pushed back against the CCSSI and the NGA?  These groups (what groups?) are working to remove any sort of accountability from our schools. Do these "special interest" groups want to remove ANY accountability in schools or just YOUR idea of accountability?  Several other school districts are being pressured to adopt similar resolutions in the coming weeks.  Shouldn't and don't LOCAL school districts have the authority to set their own accountability measures?  Who is Michelle Rhee to tell LOCALLY  ELECTED officials how to run their school districts?

Florida cannot afford to turn back the clock on its accountability system.  Wow, she sure is concerned about students in ALL the states, isn't she, bless her heart.

In the nearly fifteen years that Florida parents, teachers and elected officials have been using accountability systems to measure our students’ progress, the improvement in Florida’s educational system has been undeniable.  So why is Rhee trying to undermine parents, teachers and elected officials for HER version of accountability?  Who made her the queen of education?

Education professionals across the state of Florida - at all levels - should stand up for the accountability systems that have successfully transformed Florida's education system!  If the systems have worked for 15 years, then why any district or official follow Michelle Rhee's system when she doesn't even LIVE in Florida?

* denotes required field

StudentsFirst

on facebook




Thursday, August 2, 2012

StudentsFirst, the Full Court Press (Arne Duncan would be Proud) and Olympic Videos in Missouri.

StudentsFirst practicing Arne Duncan's love of basketball moves.


StudentsFirst's full court press has started in Missouri.  We've gotten 2 new lobbyists for the organization (one is from the national office), Lea Crusey lets us know which Missouri politicians support RTTT-like mandates  and we now have a video from the organization with an Olympic theme of American students falling behind in educational competition with other countries.

We are somewhat behind the curve of some folks in getting this video.  It hit the national circuit last week and it has not been a critical success with many bloggers, educators and writers.  They take Ms. Rhee and her organization to task for this video. From Rheefirst:


StudentsFirst ‘Olympic’ ad reaction roundup

The coverage wasn’t all bad, however.  RedState loved it.


Below is StudentsFirst email about American students falling behind other countries.  Read it and determine what you think about the video.  One bit of information about international testing that just might skew Studentsfirst's message is that the US educational systems test every public education students, including special education students.  Other countries don't test all their students so these test results might not be "apples to apples".  Here's another thought: if American students are "falling behind", maybe this is because of the onerous federal mandates districts and teachers must adhere to...and what does "education reform" of the Obama administration and private organizations do?  Just creates MORE mandates via Common Core/RTTT. 

 StudentsFirst should make a video pointing out that fact instead of placing all the blame on teachers and public schools.  They can't possibly succeed with unattainable standards and mandates.  Was nothing learned from the failure of NCLB?  Apparently not.  It's just easier to blame the teachers and schools that have to teach under goals that can never be reached:

*************************************************************************************************

No bronze, no silver, and certainly no gold.

The London Olympics are well underway and, while our athletes are putting on an incredible performance, the U.S. continues to fall behind in a far more important competition: our children's education. We can do better than this.

While our teachers and students are working incredibly hard, the U.S. education system has failed to give them the support they need to succeed. The sad thing is, we know what it takes to improve things, but we just aren't doing it.

Let me give you an idea of how badly we're doing. If our education system jumped into a pommel horse routine ... well, let's just say it wouldn't look too pretty:


That's right: 25th place in math and 17th in science.

If the U.S. education system is ever going to go for gold we need to shape up. Your involvement is helping StudentsFirst bring common sense reforms to states across the country, but we need your voice to help us spread the word.

See how U.S. education stacks up and share our latest video with your friends and family now:

http://www.studentsfirst.org/olympics-video-2

Thanks you for all you do -- keep it up.

Hari Sevugan
Vice President of Communications
StudentsFirst

P.S. Learn more about how we can make change in a new op-ed written by Michelle Rhee in USA Today: http://ow.ly/cE5lT

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Who Is StudentsFirst Backing in the MO Elections?

This arrived in our mailbox this week from StudentsFirst.

We are pleased to announce our endorsements for the 2012 Missouri Primary Elections for elected offices in the State's General Assembly. The endorsed candidates below have been selected based upon their responses to a questionnaire on education policies and, if incumbents, their record of support for common sense education reform efforts. All those endorsed have clearly demonstrated their commitment to improving education for all children in Missouri.
           [Note: SF's letter did not identify party, but we have added it to show that this is not limited to one party.]

  • Representative Steve Webb (D) - 67th House DistrictRep. Webb's leadership as Chair of the Legislative Black Caucus has been vital to the advancement of education reform discourse, as well as passing of education reform legislation, in Missouri.
  • Representative Jamilah Nasheed (D) – 5th Senate District  Representative Jamilah Nasheed plans to bring her experiences from the State House to the State Senate this coming year. As Chair of the Urban Issues Committee, Rep. Nasheed is highly qualified to tackle the problems facing students in urban school districts.
  • Representative Chrissy Sommer (R) – 106th House District Parents are among the most critical stakeholders in education. As the former President of the Harvest Ridge PTO, Rep. Chrissy Sommer has firsthand experience in working with schools to improve outcomes for students.
  • Sarah Gillooly (D) – 24th House District Sarah Gillooly is a community activist who has spent her career advocating for the most vulnerable members of society. If elected, she will carry that passion with her to the State House.
  • John Sellars (R) – 134th House District Throughout his career, John Sellars has held various management positions that have taught him how to be an effective leader. As a substitute teacher and spouse of a a long time schoolteacher, he brings a practitioner's perspective to the challenges currently facing Missouri's school system.
  • Representative Bill Lant (R) – 159th House District Representative Bill Lant is a former school board member with a deep understanding of the problems currently facing Missouri's schools.
  • Representative Sylvester Taylor (D) – 75th House District Rep. Taylor has been a strong proponent of what is best for kids in his district. If reelected, he will advocate for changes that will improve outcomes for students not only across his district, but also across Missouri.
  • Derrick Good (R) – 111th House District  Derrick Good is a practicing attorney who is familiar with the intricacies of the law. If elected, he will work to prioritize education reform legislation that provides teachers with meaningful feedback on their teaching performance.
  • Eugene Dokes (R) – 70th House District As a former member of the Navy and a businessman, Dr. Dokes understands the meaning of responsibility and public service and will work to ensure that Missouri's children are adequately prepared to compete in the 21st Century.
  • Representative Penny Hubbard (D) – 78th House District  Representative Penny Hubbard has been one of the strongest Democratic voices for education reform that puts the student at the center of every decision in the State House. If reelected, she will continue to be a supporter of improving schools both in St. Louis as well as across Missouri.
  • Representative Kevin Elmer (R) – 139th House District  Representative Kevin Elmer has a great track record of prioritizing what is best for students. In this coming legislative session, he will continue to be an advocate for Missouri's children.
  • Representative Mike Colona (D) – 80th House District As the House Minority Whip, Rep. Mike Colona is one of the most influential proponents of education reform in the Missouri Legislature.
  • Mike Owens (D) – 84th House District  Mike Owens is a 30-year veteran journalist who knows what it means to hold public officials accountable. Owens plans to bring this sense of accountability to the school system if elected to the State House.
  • Representative Mike McGhee (R) – 21st Senate District Making sure every child in Missouri has the option to attend a high quality school is one of the priorities of Rep. Mike McGhee's Senate race. His belief in the need for real change to improve public education that, if elected, will make a difference for all children not only in his district, but also across the state.
  • Martin Casas (D) – 79th House District  Martin Casas is a parent and small business owner who has campaigned on the importance of great teachers and great schools for all children. If elected, he will prioritize education reform as one of his top priorities.
  • Representative Ward Franz (R) – 33rd Senate District, former Chair of the Republican Caucus  Representative Ward Franz is a leader looking to move from the State House to the State Senate. As the former Chair of the Republican Caucus in the House, Rep. Franz will be a powerful proponent of education reform in the Senate.
  • Lt. Governor Peter Kinder (R)  As the current Lt. Governor, Peter Kinder has worked to help the state to prosper. LT. Governor Kinder has been an advocate for some of the most vulnerable groups in Missouri and, if reelected, will continue to be an advocate for students across Missouri.

For those who have forgotten what StudentsFirst is, this is the brainchild of Michelle Rhee who has become the darling of education reform.  You can read more about her and this group here, here, here and here.

StudentsFirst goals for Missouri are:
  • revised teacher evaluations (already done with Common Core Standards and the NCLB waiver we recently received - don't know what else SF can do); 
  • tenure reform (tenure is covered by district contract which is currently negotiated individually by each school district - I guess SF would like to take that decision out of local control as well)
  • school choice (i.e. charter schools which will only provide choice to the parents in which building their child will be taught Common Core Standards).

Martin Casas is the only one who has some prior knowledge of SF, Rhee and education reform.  His wife was in Teach For America. It would behoove the others on this list to do a little more research into StudentsFirst and other Michelle Rhee creations before listing SF's endorsement on their campaign page. That research should make it clear fairly quickly that the education reform movement is more about corporate control and profit than student achievement.

Exempli Gratia - this email was sent to Diane Ravitch and provides a personal account not at all uncommon for TFAers (the author was actually in a Teaching Fellowship program, but it was established by Michelle Rhee and organized in almost exactly the same way as TFA.)

There has been so much debate about educational reform and about Michele Rhee and her Students First organization. I am compelled to describe my experience this past June with the Rhode Island Teaching Fellows Program, a Rhee brainchild. The Teaching Fellows work along the same lines of The New Teacher Project but the Teaching Fellows is an alternative route to teacher certification. The premise is to attract people from the public sector and after 5 weeks of training they will be employed as first year’s teachers in high needs urban schools. The catch phrase is “Let’s close the achievement gap” and get your teaching certification in an alternative route program-well yes I know all about the achievement gap and only starting to realize all the components at work and I decided to re-enter school to become a teacher and this program sounded perfect. I could not have been more wrong

We start week one learning this militant type tactics of behavioral control-such as “Do it again” “Do it now” and “Slant” to name just a few-we practice this over and over again in a highly structured environment where our every move is scheduled and monitored. We are told where to sit, when to stand and when to speak-they occasionally mix up the tables I believe so friendships are not formed and “talk” starts.  We have lunch in groups with our coaches. We are actually scheduled to meet with our coaches for “debriefing” where we are told not to talk and only answer with yes and no. We watch videos of children in which these tactics are employed in other States

Students are drilled on how to line up, hands by side, mouths closed-told which way to turn and what muscle to move next. They are instructed like they are in the military or prison. All the kids in the video are of course black-these behavioral control tactics are of course not utilized in white schools. A strict agenda is posted in the morning requiring us to adhere to it without question. We are at this point working 16 hours a day and not thinking clearly at all. We are then told to start working on lesson plans that we will implement in the field experience component in the evening and e-mail them to our coach for a review. This lesson planning has to be evidently self-taught as I have taken no education courses, which is one of the requirements of the program. 

The second week of the program we begin the field experience component is a 4 week 2.5 hour class consisting of students requiring summer school to recover credits. These are the very students we are supposed be so concerned about with the achievement gap. After 1 week of training we are individually thrown in front of this class of 22, still being monitored by training team members. I will argue that I am NOT an effective teacher after one week of training and these kids WILL suffer because of it. By the third day, 6 of my students were not in class and I believe they will ultimately drop out and as an inexperienced RI Teaching Fellow I am completely responsible; it is reprehensible what we are doing to these kids. 

At the end of this 5 week period we are then placed in an urban school where we are allowed to teach under an emergency teaching certification. At this point we are required to join the TNTP academy where throughout out the year we attend classes and workshops to get our own teaching certification after one year. So the premise is that to qualify for the $5500 educational grant through AmeriCorps you must work in a high need urban school in Rhode Island, what is called the urban4-Providence, Pawtucket, Woonsocket, and Central Falls. These are exactly the only districts we are allowed to apply to. We are also enrolled in AmeriCorps and will receive our educational grant of $5500 after one year of service. 

The cost of this TNTP academy is $6ooo-hmmm…so I will argue that the Teaching Fellows Program doesn’t care one bit about closing the achievement gap but in fact victimizes our low income minority students to achieve their own agenda which is enrollment in the TNTP academy and to fill their own pockets with outlandish salaries. . I saw advertisements on employment agencies sites for jobs within the Teaching Fellows organization paying anywhere between $60-and $78,000.00 per year-a lot of income to certify perhaps 20 teachers a year in the State of Rhode Island and my guess is less than half of those will stay in the high needs urban public schools. When I began the program there where 28 fellows; I was the fourth to drop out by the eighth day. I believe this organization is syphoning money from public education grants to serve their own purposes and the students that are being harmed are the low income black and brown students in these high needs urban schools. Michelle Rhee and this organization need to be stopped. I have decided to continue on and obtain my M.A.T. and become an effective teacher the proper way in two years and not destroy the lives of unsuspecting students on my way. I am continually looking for ways to expose this organization for what it is and hope it’s days are numbered before any more harm is done to these students.
–Theresa Laperche

These are the kinds of programs and the thought process endemic to StudentsFirst and Michelle Rhee.

Did you know, Representative Nasheed, that St. Louis City schools have a certain number of positions set aside for these people that cannot be filled with more qualified teachers?  Did you know, Representative Sommers, that the national PTO was one of the groups behind the development of common core standards which will take control for what the children are taught in the classroom completely away from the teacher, principal and school district, when you were president of the Harvest Ridge PTO? Probably not because the local PTO is never consulted on curriculum or classroom policy. They have been relegated to being primarily a fundraising operation for the school and allowed only to participate in school functioning on the fringe. Are you aware, Lt Gov. Kinder, that charter schools have an 83% failure rate, are frequently run by hedge fund companies that are outside our state, produce test scores that are at best comparable with the local school (and often are worse) and tend to provide little control to the local board for their operation?

Is this what we want coming to our state? Is this what you were thinking of when you talked about education reform Mr.Ms. Representative?

Monday, July 30, 2012

A Former Michelle Rhee Principal Registers as StudentsFirst Lobbyist in Missouri.

StudentsFirst National Outreach Director now a registered lobbyist in Missouri. 

Meet one of the newest lobbyists in Missouri for StudentsFirst who will try to recruit more Missouri legislators to sign on to the reforms set forth by that organization. Ximena Hartsock became a registered Missouri lobbyist for StudentsFirst in May 2012. This is from the StudentsFirst website where National staff office members are listed:


Ximena is an experienced advocate for education reform and currently leads national outreach efforts at StudentsFirst. Prior to joining StudentsFirst, she served in former Washington, DC Mayor Adrian Fenty's executive cabinet. She has over a decade of experience working in the Washington DC public school system in multiple capacities, including her roles as a teacher, Assistant Principal and Principal and Deputy Chief of Teaching and Learning. Growing up in a family of teachers in Chile, Ximena’s strong commitment to improving opportunities for children and the philosophy that education is the most powerful equalizer have deeply influenced her both personally and professionally. A graduate of the University of La Serena in Chile and The George Washington University, Ximena has an extensive background in research with an emphasis on English Language Learners and the impact of parental involvement on student achievement.
As an immigrant, I feel I have an obligation to give back to a country that has provided me with so much. The education I have received has greatly contributed to the rich opportunities I have had here in the United States, and I truly believe that education is the most powerful equalizing force in society. There are few causes nobler than providing a high-quality education to all children so they have a chance to fulfill their hopes and dreams. There is rarely a more deserving fight than ensuring that all children have a fair chance to succeed.

 

From Linkedin: 


Dr. Ximena Hartsock
National Director of Outreach at StudentsFirst
Washington D.C. Metro Area
Education Management
Nonprofit; 11-50 employees; Education Management industry
January 2011Present (1 year 7 months) DC-CA
Oversees national outreach efforts.

Dr. Ximena Hartsock's Experience:
National Director of Outreach

Deputy Chief of Teaching and Learning

District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS)

Government Agency; 1001-5000 employees; Primary/Secondary Education industry
20072009 (2 years)

Principal
Ross Elementary School
2006 – 2007 (1 year) Washington DC
Assistant Principal
Harriet Tubman Elementary School
May 2004 – June 2005 (1 year 2 months) Washington DC



Dr. Hartsock's tenure in DC was under the leadership of Michelle Rhee.  Here is some additional information on Dr. Hartsock from the Washington Post:



Hartsock has a doctorate in leadership, educational administration and policy studies from George Washington University. She also has a master's degree in education from the University of La Serena in Chile, as well as undergraduate degrees in philosophy and Spanish education from the same school. After completing her undergraduate studies, Hartsock taught high school in Chile and elementary school in Virginia. 

Over the past four years, she has gone from being an assistant principal at Harriett Tubman Elementary School to principal of Ross Elementary School, where her students posted gains in reading and math on the D.C. Comprehensive Assessment System, and then to the D.C. public schools administrative post.



Dr. Hartsock has an interesting background in Washington DC  politics and connections.  Her job in the Fenty administration's executive cabinet did not end well:

  • She was rejected for the position of parks and recreation in DC in 2009. She was an interim in this job for a short time when she left the DC Public School system.  This link from a voting councilman gives a differing reason for the vote not approving her  purportedly because of racial bias. 
  • This link provides more background information: D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty today introduced his latest choice to head the Department of Parks and Recreation, Jesús Aguirre. Like his controversial predecessor, outgoing interim-cum-acting director Ximena Hartsock, Aguirre comes from DCPS, where he's been Director of Operations under Michelle Rhee. In a rare move, Hartsock was denied confirmation by the D.C. Council, whose members cited, among other things, her inexperience in matters related to sports and recreation. In a press release, the mayor's office described Aguirre's duties at DCPS as having been responsible for overseeing "day-to-day support on staffing, facilities, finances, and logistics, as well as rapid response during emergent incidents" for over "120 school principals and instructional superintendents." Not a lot of recreation in there, either.
  • One of the reasons ostensibly she was not confirmed for this position was her professional relationship with Rhee and Mayor Fenty.
  • Here is Dr. Hartsock's statement on why she was not appointed as the Department of Parks and Recreation in DC: “They discriminated against me for being Latin and a woman”
  • This wikipedia link gives a detailed history of the DC parks system and background of the refusal of the city council to confirm her as director.



***************************************************************

The Missouri legislators must need help learning about education from a seasoned bureaucrat not afraid of political battles.  The original lobbyists for StudentsFirst are based in Missouri, but apparently, they weren't delivering enough votes for the organization to implement most of their programs.  Dr. Hartsock has been through the grinder of DC politics and politicians, so dealing with the Missouri legislators will probably be a piece of cake.

Since we're under common core and under the direction of federal mandates and a consortia based out of Washington state for our educational decisions, it doesn't matter if lobbyists are from Washington DC to "advise" legislators on  how they should vote for legislation proffered by groups (such as StudentsFirst) not based in Missouri. 

These organizations and lobbyists tell  taxpayers and parents that they have the best interests of MISSOURI children in mind, even though they may not live in Missouri or be based in the state.  From the Missouri StudentsFirst website:
 
Take Action: Missouri

Missouri students are struggling.  Every child deserves a great teacher and a great school.
StudentsFirst members are working right now to pass new laws that will put student interests first.  Tell us how you want to be involved.

Action Center

Please email your state senator and ask them to vote YES on HB 1526.
Take Action


Google "studentsfirst" and your state, and you will most likely find the same concern about your students as it exists in Missouri.  StudentsFirst writes: "Missouri children are struggling".  Approximately 7% of Missouri districts were struggling.  Why is StudentsFirst in Missouri when a small percentage of schools were designated as failing? Who should decide what makes a "great teacher" and a "great school"?  StudentsFirst or local communities?

Missouri taxpayers should be tickled to death the National Director of Outreach from a self-described "education management industry" will be speaking with Missouri legislators  to convince them to run schools via a business management model.  Just think.  Missouri can do away with elected school boards.  Who needs local representation anyway?  Taxpayers can rest easy.  All school decisions can be made by these private companies.  Just send them your children and  your money and they'll take care of everything else.

Dr. Hartsock worked with Michelle Rhee in DC and suffered the same fate as Ms. Rhee when the political winds shifted.  Now it appears StudentsFirst and its lobbyists want to try the same experiment that didn't work in DC schools with a different set of politicians and bureaucrats for all the schools in Missouri. 

With the increase of lobbying pressure of StudentsFirst and registering a national staff member as a Missouri lobbyist, there must be a lot riding on the line for the education reform movement in the state, don't you think? 




Saturday, July 28, 2012

StudentsFirst Increases Lobbyists in Missouri. Where are Our Gift Cards?

StudentsFirst Ms. Robinson's protestations make about as much sense as this snippet.


Michelle Rhee's StudentsFirst is a hot topic on some educational blogs yesterday.  Diane Ravitch and Bob Sikes have unleashed an unexpected avalanche of readers' comments on their recent blogs about StudentsFirst and a letter from a StudentsFirst paid organizer, Catherine Durkin Robinson.  Robinson took exception to being called out by name in Sikes' blog about her plea for StudentsFirst supporters to comment online and support the education reformers and their version of school "choice":

With a legislative battle looming in Florida, corporate reformers propagandists have their marching orders. Last night, Michelle Rhee’s Florida rep sent out calls for an online comments campaign.
> From: Catherine Robinson
> Date: July 26, 2012 9:58:12 PM EDT
> To: Catherine Robinson
> Subject: rapid responses needed – and a contest!

Hi all,
… starting right now, there will be a monthly contest for the best rapid response. The more comments you leave on blog posts, the more times you can enter! Post a polite and persuasive pro-reform comment and email me the link so I can check it out.
That’s all you have to do!
At the end of the month (August 26th at midnight) I will announce the winner. Not only will that winner get a gift card to the restaurant or store of choice, but he or she will also be promoting the cause of real and transformative change in public schools! What could be better?
Robinson submitted a list of supporting signatures at the Florida Senate Budget Committee on Parent Trigger last spring on behalf of Rhee’s StudentsFirst.  As of yet, Scathing Purple Musings has not received any “polite and persuasive pro-reform”  comments.


Ms. Robinson replied on Sikes' blog:

I sent along an email to super-supporters called a Rapid Response Team, asking them to send me their best comments for the chance to win a gift card. I’m disheartened and dismayed that one of them would then forward my email and mischaracterize my intentions. 

Whether it’s the Obama campaign offering to buy a supporter a round-trip ticket to Chicago, or me offering to buy someone what would be a $5 gift card out of my own pocket, recognizing volunteers for their extraordinary efforts is common in grassroots organizations.

I should know. I’ve spent my whole life organizing and advocating. And so now I’m organizing over 119,000 Florida parents, teachers and concerned citizens. This has subjected me to great levels of heroism and integrity. But it has also exposed me to organized and well-funded hatred and character assassinations.

My record is clear. 

As a 25-year veteran of campaigns to end apartheid, support animal rights, protect a woman’s right to choose, bring recycling to college campuses, champion the rights of the LGBT community… 

As an 8-year teacher of at-risk youth and ESE students…

As a canvasser for Dukakis, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, and Obama in rural Pasco and Polk counties…

As a concerned mom and PTA officer…

…nothing prepared me for the level of nastiness and vitriol that descended upon me when I took this job and began to vocally advocate for policies that put students first.
But nothing will deter me or scare me away. Because last week I spoke with a mom who’s only hope of putting her son in a good school is to break the law and pretend to live in another district. I’ll keep fighting against powerful union and school board interests. I’ll keep fighting…to help her.

And shame on the rest of you.

The blog floodgates opened and readers responded to the wagging finger of "shame on the rest of you" comment by Ms. Robinson.  Be sure to read them.  Apparently the carrot of a free gift card and dinner isn't enough for these folks to give up the idea that communities and taxpayers that financially support schools should be the ones driving the educational decisions, not a organization with paid organizers.  In Missouri, the state director for StudentsFirst doesn't even live in Missouri and she didn't offer prizes to Missourians as did Ms. Robinson for Missourian support.

I wrote a response on Sikes' site and linked an article in which Ms. Robinson lectures her fellow progressives and how they should be supporting the corporate takeover of education.  Remember, "it's for the kids" and it's HER vision (via StudentsFirst) on the best educational practices that taxpayers should support and adopt.

Don't think the pressure won't be present in Missouri from Ms. Crusey to gin up the "grassroots" and StudentsFirst professional lobbyists.  The organization added two more lobbyists in our state in May 2012, bringing the total number of registered lobbyists to six: 


STUDENTSFIRST

Back to all lobby tweets

The client and lobbyist information on this page is for informational purposes only.
All information on this page has been obtained from the Missouri Ethics Commission.
Pelopidas cannot provide any additonal information about the people or companies listed on this page.

Present lobbyists

Changes in the last 90 days

Changes on: 05/01/2012
Adam ChildersAddedSTUDENTSFIRST
Ximena HartsockAddedSTUDENTSFIRST





2012 Legislative Principal

StudentsFirst

Lobbyists representing principal:
   Tim Melton
   Jeri Powell
   Michelle Rhee
   Stacey S. Webb


I am surmising since Florida has implemented more of the educational reforms supported by Arne Duncan and the Obama administration, as well as Republicans wedded to the idea that schools should operate on a business model, that it doesn't need as much prodding as do our on the fence Missouri legislators. 

The letters urging "grassroots support"  is really quite unnecessary for an organization with nine paid lobbyists, don't you think?  It really doesn't matter what the taxpayers want.  This organization will twist legislators' arms for their corporate blueprint of education.  I wonder what the StudentsFirst budget is for gift cards and free dinners in Missouri?    



Sunday, July 22, 2012

Education Reformers Discard Creativity and the Sunday Education Weekly Reader 07.22.12

Life is not linear nor standardized, no matter how hard ed reformers try to shape it into a neat & predictable data set.


Welcome to the Sunday Education Weekly Reader for 07.22.12.

A tweet from Sir Ken Robinson says volumes in 140 characters or less:

A big problem for linear, standardized systems of education is that human life is neither.

From the Amazon link:  

March 1, 2011
"It is often said that education and training are the keys to the future. They are, but a key can be turned in two directions. Turn it one way and you lock resources away, even from those they belong to. Turn it the other way and you release resources and give people back to themselves. To realize our true creative potential—in our organizations, in our schools and in our communities—we need to think differently about ourselves and to act differently towards each other. We must learn to be creative."
Ken Robinson

Sir Ken Robinson is known for his support for creative thinking and distaste for scripted education.  

Now look at one of the articles advocating "locking the resources away" and creating students wholly dependent on becoming compliant and widgets, the exact opposite of becoming creative.  From EdWeek:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

New Testing System to Gauge Career and College Readiness

A new assessment system to measure career-related content was unveiled today by the National Academy Foundation, a network of 500 career-themed high school academies, and WestEd, the San Francisco-based educational research nonprofit.

The NAF Student Certification Assessment System has been piloted in select schools over the past two years and will be rolled out this fall to about one-third of the 60,000 students at NAF academies. While the system will be built on the NAF network, the hope is that it will become a model that other high schools would adopt, says Andrew Rothstein, special adviser for education policy with NAF.

Just as a college-admissions officer might look at a student's grade point average before offering a spot in its freshman class, an employer could benefit from knowing a graduate's level of job-skill proficiency before extending a job offer. Also, students who complete career programs are often strong candidates for college, but it can be difficult to gauge their readiness with current tools.

There are three parts to the NAF certificate:

1. Project assessments: Students would be evaluated on curriculum-based, classroom projects that demonstrate proficiency in technical content and skills. 

2. End-of-course exams: The tests would include a variety of questions to reflect depth of career knowledge.

3. Work-based learning assessments: Supervisors would give feedback on students' ability to apply career and technology knowledge on an internship.

With the system, all assessments would be done online, and students would be given a score at the end of each NAF course. The assessments were designed with input from industry professionals to reflect what is needed in the workplace, according to NAF officials.

The NAF academics, which are located in 39 states, currently focus on five industry areas: finance, hospitality & tourism, information technology, engineering, and health sciences. NAF was founded 30 years ago with a focus on closing the achievement gap and serving low-income, at-risk students.

The NAF system is intended to complement the assessments being developed for the Common Core State Standards, says Rothstein. While the common core emphasizes more college readiness, this system looks at career- and college-readiness as defined by core academics, career knowledge, foundational skills, interpersonal skills, and self-management. (The groups developing common assessments have wrestled over the definition of career readiness.)

Brenda Dann-Messier, assistant secretary of the office of vocational and adult education with the U.S. Department of Education, moderated a panel discussion on the new system at the NAF event in Washington today. Employers are having difficulty finding qualified workers because too often they lack the right combination of academic and technical skills. "We must help business and industry find the workforce they need," said Dann-Messier, adding that there needs to be an increased emphasis on a system to assess career readiness—not just college readiness.

On the panel, Stanley Rabinowitz, director of assessment- and standards-development services for WestEd, said that for too long there has been an unfortunate distinction between instruction and assessment. With this system, part of the evaluation is embedded in the curriculum, and the cumulative aspect of the students' work is considered. It better mirrors the workplace and how employees improve through feedback and peer review, he said.

Hunter Rawlings, president of the Association of American Universities, said the NAF Student Certificate could be an extra tool to help evaluate students in the college-admission process. "It is not going to replace the current admissions process, but it adds a couple of elements that helps college and universities make decisions," he said.

The technology makes it easier to assess students' career-readiness, and the economic imperative creates a perfect time to launch this career- and college-preparedness measure, said J.D. Hoye, president of the NAF. The focus should be on lifting both paths, college and careers.

The best reason for assessing college and career readiness is that then teachers will cover both. "What you test is what you get," said Rabinowitz. "It's our responsibility to test responsibly. If we want assessment to go a certain way, we better reward teachers who teach that way."

The assessment will give a full picture to a college or employer about a student's applied career knowledge, said Rabinowitz.

Rawlings said there is a need for instruments that are clear-cut and simple to help understand basics about students. "I'm finished with the idea that there is one way to save our schools," he said. "There is not one great answer."

ACT Inc. recently announced its plans to roll out digital college- and career-readiness tests for students beginning in 3rd grade.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is one of the saddest and bleakest articles on the future path for education I've read in a long time.  Is there any doubt in anyone's mind what education means today?  As Sir Ken Robinson wrote:

"It is often said that education and training are the keys to the future. They are, but a key can be turned in two directions. Turn it one way and you lock resources away, even from those they belong to. Turn it the other way and you release resources and give people back to themselves."

Did the EdWeek article mention anything about teaching students to think for themselves so they can make decisions in directing their own lives, or did you take away that "the assessments were designed with input from industry professionals to reflect what is needed in the workplace?"  

Why would a student even attempt to be creative and think out of the box when all that's required and rewarded for students is to learn "what is needed in the workplace?  This "common" type of education and testing will certainly create compliant students but not supply the creative educational foundation needed for new ideas and technologies.  

Don't believe teachers will applaud, support or know how to teach those students who learn "outside of the box".  Remember what the spokesperson from NAF stated? "If we want assessment to go a certain way, we better reward teachers who teach that way."   The assessments are driving what and how your children learn so they can become useful tools for the workforce.  The assessments are primary, not the knowledge or creativity imparted so students can become independent thinkers and responsible for their own lives and decisions.

When your legislators say "it's for the children" and support Common Core standards and the education reform set forth by corporations such as StudentsFirst, National Academy Foundation and WestEd, they are "turning the key locking the resources away" from the children they are supposed to be helping.   "It's for the children" has become "It's for the corporations".


 

Friday, May 4, 2012

Reader Calls Carpetbagging StudentsFirst Request Asking Missouri Citizens to "Pick up the Phone...Hooey"--Part II


Educational reform in Missouri?




The carpetbagging organization StudentsFirst is pleased with the passage of HB1526 which is now advancing to the Senate.  This bill states teacher performance, not seniority, should govern teacher layoffs.  From the St. Louis Post Dispatch:


JEFFERSON CITY • The Missouri House's Republican leadership pushed through one of its priorities today, passing a bill aimed at ending some job protections for veteran public school teachers.

Under the bill, school districts that have to let teachers go because of falling enrollment or declining revenue could not base layoff decisions on seniority.

A teacher's performance -- including "evidence of increased student achievement" -- would be the most heavily weighted factor in the decision, according to the bill.

Supporters said teachers should be held accountable for their performance.

"This bill's about freedom, it's about empowerment of local school districts, and it's ultimately about whether your children have the chance to succeed," said Majority Leader Tim Jones, R-Eureka.

Rep. Joe Aull, D-Marshall and a former school administrator, viewed the bill as a slap at teachers.

He said Missouri's teacher pay ranks 47th in the nation. Yet by many yardsticks, such as a 10 percent rise in the state's high school graduation rate, Missouri schools are improving, Aull said.

"These statistics tell me that somebody's doing a pretty good job, and that somebody is teachers," he said.

The House had already scaled back the bill, removing provisions that would have set up a teacher evaluation system based in part on student growth, as measured by standardized tests and other means.

StudentsFirst, a California-based national student advocacy group, has been lobbying for the bill and running television ads touting it. The group said it was pleased to see the slimmed-down version advance.

"We have an opportunity here to take a solid step forward on a truly bold educational reform," said Lea Crusey, state director of StudentsFirst.

Lea Crusey, who has no experience in Missouri as a teacher or administrator once again knows what is best for Missouri students.  Does this sound the same as other special interest lobbying groups knowing what is best for students?  This is a fight between the teacher unions and the educational reformers who want to diminish the unions' hold on educational matters.  

Representative Jones talks about the "empowerment of local school districts" to now make decisions.  That's partially true as districts can make this decision based on state action.  What is lost in this discussion is that the local districts still don't have autonomy to make their own decisions for their own schools in terms of how to fire teachers (that's from the state), assessment choices and in practicality, curriculum decisions since the curricula must fit the assessments.   Are these the same legislators that tout "local control"?
  
The legislature seems content to let the Common Core consortia drive how and what Missouri children learn so why are they so concerned about the control of teacher tenure? Is it because StudentsFirst approves of common core and centralized, nationalized control of education?

Below is another email sent from a reader signed by Ms. Crusey which urged support from Missouri residents on HB 1526.  Note the second paragraph.  Just who should be setting these teacher and principal evaluationsStudentsFirst?  The unions?  The legislature?  The local school district?  Again, does the parent/taxpayer even have a voice in these decisions?

Take note of her third paragraph.  She's as much special interest as the groups she rails on about.  
**************************************************************************


***see remarks below (Email header):" xxx, can you pick up the phone today?"


Dear xxx,

Missouri's education policies must put student interests above all others -- now is the time to stand up for student-focused education reform.

Missouri legislators are considering a bill that would be a big win for our students. HB 1526 will help make sure that every Missouri student has a great teacher by establishing meaningful teacher and principal evaluations statewide that reflect student learning. It is the right thing to do for our kids.

Unfortunately, special interests are coming out in force in defense of the status quo and are lobbying against this bill. Please take a minute to call your legislator and tell them to vote YES on HB 1526 so that every Missouri child has the benefit of an effective teacher. If you click on the link below, we’ll give you all of the information you need and even connect you to your representative.

Call your representative now!

Meaningful teacher and principal evaluations will enable Missouri to build an excellent teacher workforce by finally recognizing and retaining excellent educators and providing support to those who need improvement. In addition, the legislation being considered will make sure that even when layoffs are unfortunately necessary, the most effective teachers will stay in the classroom. Layoffs will no longer be based solely on seniority but will take teacher quality into account.

Teachers have the most significant impact on student success of any in-school factor. Every Missouri student deserves an excellent teacher. Please make sure your voice is heard -- tell your representative to vote in support of HB 1526 so that Missouri's kids have the best teachers possible:

StudentsFirst.org/call-your-missouri-legislator

Thank you for your support at this critical moment.

Lea

Lea Crusey
Missouri State Director, StudentsFirst
Twitter.com/MOStudentsFirst



***************************************************************************************************************

****From the reader: 

 I'll pick up the phone when StudentFirst actually put students first: first in line to receive blame for not working, first in line to suffer the consequences of consciously rejecting the educational system.  When my kid sits in class and is surrounded by 5 students who shove the worksheet back in the teacher's hand and say, "Don't even bother.  I ain't doin' that sh**" we need to blame those students first and not the teacher for "failing to motivate them."  What a bunch of hooey.



Site Meter