"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power." - Thomas Jefferson 1820

"There is a growing technology of testing that permits us now to do in nanoseconds things that we shouldn't be doing at all." - Dr. Gerald Bracey author of Rotten Apples in Education

Search This Blog

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Are Parkway Parents Paying Attention??!

It looks like Parkway parents didn't catch this at the last couple of school board meetings when it was being budgeted for and approved, but hopefully they caught it today in St Louis Today's Suburban Journal.  The Parkway school district will outfit all their elementary students with a "health meter" that they will be required to wear 24/7 for a week (for now). Read the full article below.

When is the line crossed between better health and surveillance?
In early 2012, wristwatch-like devices called Polar active monitors will be used by older students in PE classes at all 18 Parkway elementary schools. District officials say the devices should help improve the students' fitness and academic achievement. 

Later this school year, the district plans to collect data about activity levels and even sleep patterns for a week at a time. It will have the students wear the devices round the clock.
Some parents and legal experts are raising privacy concerns about at least that aspect of the program.
The project
Ron Ramspott, coordinator of health, outdoor and physical education for Parkway, said a pilot project started in Aprilprovided the monitors during physical education classes to students at Henry and Ross elementary schools. Shenandoah Valley Elementary School in Chesterfield joined the pilot in August.
At the district's Dec. 7 Board of Education meeting, the board approved expanding the project beyond the pilot phase. For the program starting this year at all elementary schools, the district will target grades four and five initially, Ramspott said.The monitors measure activity by tracking every movement of the person wearing them. They display steps taken, calories spent and time spent at various levels of activity. An animated figure on the monitor indicates the activity level. A bar shows the target time for doing moderate to vigorous activity and the amount of time achieved at that level.
Under the pilot program, the three schools each received 25 monitors, which cost $90 apiece. The monitors have been rotated among third-, fourth- and fifth-graders in physical education classes.
Each of the district's elementary schools will receive 25 monitors in January and begin using them in PE class. However, the focus of the monitors' use will change gradually, so that by the end of the year students will continually wear the monitors for a full week at a time to assess activity levels.
"We want to be able to look at both physical activity and sleep patterns," Ramspott said. "We also want to see how various activity levels correlate to student achievement and behavior."
Concerns of parents
Ramspott said Parkway will require parental consent to participate largely because of the responsibility of caring for the monitors. (Really!!? They only want parental consent to care for the monitors - MEW question.)

--> "We haven't had any parents refuse to participate at this point as we have only used them in PE classes," Ramspott said. But some parents and others insist they have concerns.
Beth Huebner, PTO co-president at Ross and mother of sons in first and fourth grades, said she wasn't aware of her older child wearing one of the devices and she was never asked for consent
"I'd want to see data generated to help me understand calories burned and sleep patterns," said Huebner, a professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. "I would ask the district tell me about it particularly if the information would be used for district analysis."
Cara Bauer, PTO president at Shenandoah Valley and mother of a son in first grade and a daughter in fifth grade, said she's heard about the monitors from her daughter, Caroline. She said her daughter doesn't like wearing one and calls them "the funny watch."
"I wish Parkway would let parents know what's going on with the program," Bauer said. "I feel they're getting into privacy issues, into people's personal lives, when they have to be worn at home. That kind of makes me a little leery, and, though I think the monitors are a fantastic idea in school, I don't want that at
home." She questioned how the data will be used.
"What will they do with all this information they'll glean from my kid?" Bauer asked. "I'd be curious to see what information they're getting off these contraptions. They're OK in PE, but they make me question why the district isn't being up front with parents about what the program will be at home."
Neil Richards, a professor of law with Washington University in St. Louis who teaches privacy and civil liberties courses, said he  feels the plan for the devices constitutes "a major privacy issue."
"The school district eventually will be engaging in surveillance of kids' sleep and exercise patterns outside the school day," he said. "Though physical activity is important and obesity is a problem, the district could not require kids to wear them because I think it would be a violation of their and their families' Fourth
Amendment rights, which is pretty easily unconstitutional."
And wearing them voluntarily doesn't eliminate privacy concerns, Richards said.
"They'll create a record of medical information about children around the clock," he said. "Even if it serves laudable public health goals, it's a fairly Orwellian step for a school district to engage in."
Benefits of monitoring
--> Ramspott said the current focus in physical education in schools has been on the benefits of especially moderate to vigorous activity. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is tied to the intensity of movement, he said. Examples include brisk walking, light jogging, biking, skating and dancing.
 It's recommended by the U.S. Surgeon General that people get 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity on most days of the week for obesity prevention, muscle and bone growth, stress
management and cardiovascular fitness, Ramspott said.
 "The monitors, by showing their progress, allow students to be accountable for reaching moderate to vigorous physical activity," Ramspott said
He said past research shows kids in physical education class are getting the best health benefits only 6 percent to 10 percent of the time. He said the monitors help teachers more accurately assess that percentage of time.
"So teachers can use the data to figure how to design class time to maximize physical activity," Ramspott said.
He called the devices "a much more fair way of evaluating students with regards to level of participation and physical activity in PE class, which is something that is evaluated on most if not all days in PE."
Ramspott said the district plans to share all physical activity and sleep reports with parents and begin exploring correlations between physical activity, sleep patterns, health risk factors and academic performance.
"Our goal is to reduce risk factors for obesity and encourage higher student achievement," Ramspott said.
Data from both the California Study of 2003, 2005, 2007 and from Parkway show a correlation between increased levels of fitness and higher academic achievement, he said.
"Students who pass more of the fitness proficiency levels on the Parkway Fitness Test score higher on reading and math on both the MAP and SAT-7 tests," he said. "It is a positive linear correlation between fitness levels and math/reading scores on these two tests. It does not prove that fitness makes us smarter, but (it) does bring a strong case for increased fitness and the increased capacity to learn.
Laura Beckmann, physical education and health teacher at Shenandoah Valley Elementary School, said her students can watch the monitors and see their physically active minutes climb up. The school also started a web-based program so she can download each monitors's data and come up with group and individual activity summaries, to track up to three weeks of time.
"These reports will go into portfolios to let kids examine their own behaviors and set goals," Beckmann said.
Amy Sydnor, physical education and health teacher at Ross Elementary School in Creve Coeur, said her students that do not wear the monitors wear pedometers instead. Ramspott said the district uses several methods including pedometers for measuring activity levels in PE class.
Sydnor called the activity monitors "a great resource to ensure kids are getting the amount of activity they need to be healthy.
In the Rockwood School District, staff is completing setting up Polar active monitors to track the activity of fifth-grade students at Blevins Elementary School in Eureka through polargofit.com, said Ed Mathison, health and physical education content facilitator for the district.
Privacy and research
Still, parents should be asking what data is being collected from those devices and when, Richards said. They should ask what rights they have to control the data, whether data is anonymous, what safeguards will be in place to protect data, whether the district is going to give it or sell it to anyone, when data will be destroyed, and whether the district has a privacy policy available to parents.
"If a university would do this study, they'd need to have lots of approval and consent from our internal review board, because this is a form of human subject research," Richards said. "Though the district should be applauded for ensuring kids are healthy, this kind of biological surveillance seems to go far beyond what they should be concerned with."
He wonders what's next.
"Will they start monitoring kids' nutrition at home or how many hours they spend reading at home?" Richards asked.
[end Suburban Journal piece]

Questions parents should be asking:
  • Is it the job of the school to track student health data?
  • Once it's uploaded onto a web-based program, can the district really promise its confidentiality?
  • Why does the school want information on activity at home? Is that any of their business?
  • What "corrective" actions will children whose activity falls below some set point be required to take? How will that be enforced?
We will have more on this story tomorrow. In the mean time parents should begin thinking about the ramifications of collecting this kind of data.


  1. Anngie-- really wish I thought you'd made this up.. Does this data go into that very permanent record--errr birth to death dossier the Federal Department of Education wants to keep on every kid in the country?

    Are the people who run our public schools incapable of reading the Constitution or are they so arrogant they think they are exempt from it's requirements?

  2. Yea this is too far... this crap needs to end.

  3. Who do I need to talk to about getting heads on a platter and how long will I need to wait for them and why?

  4. Every body take a breath - nobody can force kids to wear these things at home except for parents. It's up to parents to be involved and ask questions, but over-reacting isn't a rational way to deal with anything.

  5. Parkway has been the home of many failed pilot programs. Glad I don't have a kid in Parkway.

  6. aninnymouse said “Nobody can force kids to wear these things at home…”

    You can look at this and seriously identify that as the key issue? Good lord, I hope I don’t know you. What part of Reading, R’iting and ‘Rithmatic do you see monitoring a child’s activity levels and sleep patterns as falling under? Do you not grasp what assumptions this makes about not only the role of the School System, but its role in your life? Have you been so assiduous about not ‘over-reacting’, that you are willing to entertain any invasion of your life, any assumption of your child as a resource unit, as long as it isn’t ‘forced’ upon you?

    Do you completely lack sufficient warmth of imagination to see what will follow once this is accepted as being the rational norm? Here, let me help you, this is from the article,

    “… a pilot project started in April provided the monitors during physical education classes to students at Henry and Ross elementary schools. Shenandoah Valley Elementary School in Chesterfield joined the pilot in August.
    At the district's Dec. 7 Board of Education meeting, the board approved expanding the project beyond the pilot phase.”

    It began as providing monitors during phys ed classes, and is now expanding the project beyond the pilot phase… what do you suppose the ultimate purpose of the program is? This is every bit as much of a ‘pilot phase’ as wearing the monitors in phys ed class was, are you not able to see that?

    “… but over-reacting isn't a rational way to deal with anything. “

    How anyone can see this even being proposed, and not react with seething rational fury is beyond me. Personally, I’d be hard pressed to call anyone’s response to this, an over-reaction, and not reacting is just plain sick.

  7. If more parents were monitoring leisure activities, the study would never have been born.
    The minute someone ask questions, the Constitution flag goes up...a pre-packaged way of
    standing up for your kid.

    If you have nothing to hide, don't show kids how easily you can go in panic mode. Chill. Practice being a responsible adult. Just say NO if you choose.

  8. Even IF the people involved in setting this up had simple good intentions parents should be asking "Why do we need expensive $90 bracelets when you could just ask the kids to fill out an activity journal and take their carotid heartrate at certain times?" The answer would likely be that those activities do not provide reliable data. At that point look at your school board member and say, "So what you're saying is A) you don't trust us and B) this is not about teaching kids to pay attention to healthy activity levels, this is about collecting specific 'reliable' data. What gives you the right to collect any data about my child?"

  9. aninnymouse said "If you have nothing to hide..."

    You so deserve the government you are proregressively getting.

    Now excuse me please while I behave like a responsible adult and fight it.

  10. I read elsewhere about the Dept of Ed not only on the verge of collecting large amounts of personal data about children, but also changing regulations so that all information ( exercies, grades, sleep, behavior, nutrition) from now on will be non-private and will go out to whomever the government decides.

    Still like this? As an ex-public school teacher, I can only say that if people really knew what public schools were all about, they would rush to homeschool so fast their heads would spin, forming cooperatives, changing lifestyles, or doing whatever else is necessary to get the kids out of these educational laboratories.

  11. Dare I say that this is yet another reason to homeschool?


Keep it clean and constructive. We reserve the right to delete comments that are profane, off topic, or spam.

Site Meter