At
almost all of the talks I give on common core around our state someone will ask
me what is happening with Common Core in private and parochial schools. I can
always tell them what I know from having talked to leaders in the St. Louis
Archiodese and from what I hear from parents whose kids attend catholic or
other Christian schools. Many of these schools are adopting common core. What I
can’t explain is the why; explain that is without having to point out an
apparent lack of faith.
My
own view of public education is that it is like the Titanic, and like that
tribute to the latest engineering knowledge and marketing hype, it will most
likely not live up to expectations and is probably going down. My goal therefore has been to make sure that
there are plenty of lifeboats for those who want to get off. Parochial,
Christian and private schools (as well as home school) have been those
lifeboats.
In
terms of education, many of these schools have offered the kind of quality,
classical education that most parents want. Their graduates are desired by
colleges and universities because they have been prepared for the (pardon me
but I cant help using it here) rigor of college course work. They also tend to
be a better class of person, meaning that they recognize a greater power
outside themselves and have some ability to recognize their obligation towards
their fellow man. All generalizations I
will grant you, and I’m sure we can all point to exceptions within the
parochial school system. There is usually one person everyone would like to
throw out of the lifeboat. However, statistics support the generalization, and
such schools have been successfully promoting this effect in their recruitment
efforts.
TruthIn American Education reported that the National Catholic Educational
Association (NCEA), the largest private professional education organization in
the world is actively promoting and marketing common core, these Nationalized
one-size fits all standards by providing teaching materials to Catholic
Educators all over the country.
Because
the CCSSI standards are not evidence based, meaning they have never been used
anywhere and thus have no proven track record of the results promised, there is
little reason for private schools to adopt them when they already know what
their own standards and curriculum produce. This is one of the reasons it is so
hard to understand why Catholic and Christian schools would consciously choose
to adopt Common Core. Why not let the public schools pilot them for a few
years, knowing your own product is currently superior and several reviewers
have declared CCSSI middling at best?
A
hint at the rational behind their decision may be found in these comments from
the American Christian Schools Institute.
·
CCSS
are a reality and that school educators will need to be generally aware of the
impact they will have on curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
·
…
as the CCSS become the “national consensus” it is expected that parents and
supporters will begin to ask about how the school curriculum and achievement
results aligns with the standards.
·
The
standardized testing vendors are already in the process of alignment of their
test items with CCSS and developing reports that indicate the level of mastery
by students on the aligned items.
Similar
sentiments were expressed by Dr. Lorraine Ozar in a July 2012 presentation,
“Catholic schools need to pay attention to the fact that the common core
standards are here and it is important to get on board”.
I
can’t help but recall my mother’s favorite phrase, “If all your friends jumped
off a cliff, would you jump off too?”
The
sense is that, because everyone else has adopted these as the standard measure
of education, ignoring the fact that at the moment they are nothing more than a
wish that marketing hype is true, we are afraid of being left behind. Fear is a
sign of a weak faith. This position begs the question “Why have you been
providing a separate education from the one provided in public schools all
these years? Is it just because the
public schools have been so poor at educating, or is there something more you
provide than just literacy and numeracy?”
It
is interesting that religious schools, who initially were the only places of
higher learning (think Harvard), have evolved into something that follows after
the secular world. Now the Common Core Catholic
Identity Initiative (CCCII)
“has created a massive amount of materials and detailed teaching guidelines,
even showing the controversial philosophies that it is based on (Bloom’s
taxonomy, Understanding by Design, Backward Design, outcome based education),
weeks of unit content by grade and theme – including book lists for 1st grade
that contain books referencing same-sex marriage, website links and books
promoting social activism, and secular ideas such as building a Facebook page
to make friends.”
Doug Reeves (American School Board
Journal, March 2011. P.23.) gave a presentation on the CCSS, in which
he recommended that schools:
1. Find
the common ground between present curriculum standards and the CCSS
2. Appreciate
the push to some best practices such as more informational writing
3. Prioritize
the important standards and ensure that they are being met
4. Embrace
the idea of formative assessment as critical to effective evaluation
5. Use
the standards as a floor, not a ceiling
Since private schools are not obligated to adopt common core, these suggestions are perhaps a reasonable middle ground. Number 5 is key but, as they noted, once everyone else has fully embraced common core, finding text book and test suppliers who will provide you products for all the content you are teaching above the standards will be close to impossible. If everyone else thinks the standards are the top, where does that leave you 5-10 years down the road? Most likely at the bottom like everyone else.
I
struggle with writing on this topic because I am not a bible thumper by any
means. I have never put my own children in Catholic schools, but I have always
appreciated the alternative they offer. I admire those who can speak their
faith in public and who struggle each day to live it. Perhaps that is why the
position of diocesan schools to adopt common
core seems disappointing because it shows a preference for the goals of the
secular world (which we should remind them is workers for the global economy)
rather than the spiritual goals they have for so long embraced. John Adams said,
“There are two educations. One should teach us how to make a living and the
other how to live.” Christian and parochial schools have been providing both
for centuries. The public schools have been promising recently to deliver both. Given
their track record of political correctness, the part about teaching children “how to live” takes on a more ominous meaning.
I can’t help but see a bunch of lifeboats with holes in the bottom,
slowly sinking next to the Titanic.
If you'll permit me one nitpick, there are Catholic and Protestant schools, not "Catholic and Christian" schools. The latter, perhaps unintentionally, implies the tired canard that Catholics are somehow not "real" Christians, when we were, indeed, the original Christians. Protestants don't have to agree with our theology, but they should recognize that our Early Church, pre-Luther ancestors, for all of their faults, did shed their blood to protect that Bible that they're always quoting. :-)
ReplyDeleteI say all of this in good spirit. I just don't want you to run the risk of alienating your Catholic support base. As a Catholic parent, I am livid that the parochial schools in my diocese have become little more than public schools with tuition, uniforms, and Rosaries. (The latter
we can do at home for free, thank you). Anyway, please know that I find this post dead-on and appreciate what you're doing!
The writer was correct. There are Catholic schools and Christian schools.
ReplyDeleteIt's not about lack of faith... it's about MONEY.
ReplyDeleteAt least in Chicago, anyway.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/education/private-preschools-see-more-public-funds-as-classes-grow.html?pagewanted=all&_r=2&
The article presents an honest and brilliant account of what we are facing as citizens as well as parents with the new Common Core. Other auxiliary approaches are also being tied into Common Core including teacher evaluation based on student test scores, teacher evaluation with the "Danielson method," and I-zone teaching where the teacher assists the computerized program instead of the computer software being a tool for teaching. It is more than a full court press to take over the minds and hearts of the citizenry with a new concept. To me, the impulse towards totalitarianism is clearly present.
ReplyDeleteIt is also aligned with a move to extend control over the students from age 2 to 22, or even older with compulsory daycare. And at the same time Arne Duncan, Michelle Rhee, and others want to see an extended school day, extended school week, and an extended school year. Many school districts have already eliminated summer vacation, and space vacations throughout the school year in two or three week blocks, but keep their schools basically running throughout all twelve months. Because of the increased costs involved, it is difficult to implement all these "extensions" but, believe me, they are on the table. I try not to see sinister motives and methods in all this, but it is becoming increasingly difficult for myself or any thinking person not to acknowledge that dark forces are loose in the educational systems of our countries that are anti-family, anti-faith, anti-federalism, anti-privacy, anti-individualism, and, incredibly, anti-achievement. I could give examples from my own 20+ years as a high school teacher that would knock your socks off. Thank you Missourieducationwatchdog.
How can we not see sinister motives when the new buzzwords are "womb to tomb" and "human capital"?
Delete